![]() => Maybe try with Basilisk or PM, if they "behave" better than WF.!Īnd hum, concerning your "other"/next Thread about "Search and Replace some Content.", you may want to delete that Thread yourself from the 'iMacros for FF' Sub-Forum and recreate it in the 'Data Extraction' Sub-Forum if you want me to eventually answer it, or you'll have to wait until the Forum Admin will have moved it to that Sub-Forum, which will probably take "a few Days". Other Advanced User maintains several Environments with iMacros for v8.9.7, and I "think" his Order of Preference for Browsers supporting v8.9.7 for FF is: (He will hopefully confirm/give more Info if he sees your Thread.)ġ. => This would otherwise indeed "be the Way", to tag some HTML Element with a "long enough" '!TIMEOUT_STEP' Setting that will add some dynamic Waiting-Time to the '!TIMEOUT_PAGE', there must be some HTML Element that only appears or gets activated after all the corresponding Scripts have fully loaded. "I tried to click on some text in the page while page was loading, but that didn't help because all text elements are loaded before the whole page finish loading. (Or switch to their Mobile Site if they use a different URL.) That's a Technique I often use. On the other hand, using a Mobile UA could be "a Trick" to fool the Site to switch to some "pure" HTML Content for this Page that will then display in a cleaner and more straightforward Way, that the Browser and iMacros will probably handle much better than all that from JS dynamically generated Content. => Maybe an Idea to (try to) change your UA in WF, either from some FF Add-on, or from your Script using the '!USERAGENT' Command, to force the Site to see WF and your Script as also FF52, or maybe some even later Version, like FF70 or FF77. If the Page and your Script work correctly in FF52, I would expect it/them to work also in WF v2020.06 as WF will be much more recent than FF52.īut.!, I notice in the 2 Browsers I opened this Page (manually), => PM26 + FF55, that the Content/Layout is quite different indeed, the CSS seems to have loaded "more correctly" in PM than in FF, which is a bit surprising, if any Differences, I would have expected them to be the other way around actually, but I get some Horizontal Navigation in PM (about "Your Account > Manage your Account > etc" and the different Amounts), while the Navigation/Display is Vertical in FF.Ĭould be that the Site is trying "to be clever", and displays the Page indeed deliberately differently based on the UA, and while FF52 or FF55 will indeed be correctly identified as FF52 or FF55, I know for PM26 that it very often gets identified as FF24 or FF26 while PM v26.3.3 should be identified as FF47 (if PM absolutely needs to be "converted" to FF), and I wouldn't be surprised if the same happens with WaterFox also on this Site. You didn't mention anything about '!TIMEOUT_PAGE', either in the Script or from the iMacros Global Settings, but I reckon you've "checked that", and you have the same Settings in both Browsers.? ![]() ![]() Hum, very strange, and very bad Design, probably meant to be not Searchable and not Selectable/Quotable, hum, I already come back from my "they've cleaned a bit of their Mess", pfff.!īut hum, stg not completely clear to me from your Description., does the Page (in WF) load correctly if you load it manually, but your Script doesn't respect '!TIMEOUT_PAGE'.?, while the Tab-Loading Indicator in WF is still spinning.? , even if hum., they seem to have "cleaned a bit" a part of "their Mess" since the last time I had had a Look at the HTML Source of their Site, (more than 1 Year ago actually), or at least for this "Reload" Page, all Content/Scripts are now located on "only" 3 Sites/Servers that they manage themselves, which is good, or at least for the first Level of their Embedded/Cross-Linked/Background JS Scripts, and I may have blocked already some of their Scripts, maybe I don't see the whole Structure.īut OK, a lot of the Content on this Page gets dynamically generated/retrieved from JS, so the Browser doesn't "really" know when all Content has been retrieved and the Page is "ready" for (Post)Processing on User Actions (manually of via iMacros)., and I see on Pale Moon (v26.3.3) that some Section(s) on the Page never get(s) loaded (compared to the same Page opened in FF v55.0.3), => the 5x "Easy Way." + "Consolidate" etc + the FAQ, oh but hum, this whole Content is actually just one '.jpg' Image. One of the Sites with the worst HTML Design I've ever seen.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |